My loving sister and I often have intellectual discussions that warp, bend, and evolve into some pretty heavy stuff. We somehow got onto the topic of Bill O'Reilly and his moronic new book entitled Culture Warrior, as if this pervert is some inspirational figure out to save the masses, what a joke. Anyway, she pointed out the hilarious Amazon.com tags people were associating with this garbage, 369 at the time of this post. Here's a list of the ones I found most amusing.
|
|
I really find it hard to believe this close minded prick is still on the air. Here are a few inspirationally mind blowing quotes, how thought provoking...
“The children of America have seen with their own eyes that liars can win and cheaters can prosper. They know that our nation will accept venal behavior and, in some cases, reward it with tremendous wealth and power. So why wouldn't they lie, cheat and steal?”
“Evil cannot be treated -- nor should it be. Evil has to [be] confronted and destroyed and it matters not why the evil is in play. Society has no obligation to try to rehabilitate evil.”
“It's hard to do it because you gotta look people in the eye and tell 'em they're irresponsible and lazy. And who's gonna wanna do that? Because that's what poverty is, ladies and gentlemen. In this country, you can succeed if you get educated and work hard. Period. Period.”
"That's my advice to all homosexuals, whether they're in the Boy Scouts, or in the Army or in high school: Shut up, don't tell anybody what you do, your life will be a lot easier. "
"This country is a better place because Fox News has succeeded. "
And the crap goes on and on... A buddy inspired me to write another post so I'm going to stop here. Feel free to check out the remainder of Bill O'Reilly's, Culture Warrior tags.
Word Count: 587
5 (Comments|Trackbacks)
[ RSS feed | Trackback URI | Leave a Comment ]
A lot of the tags are within reason. I think it's healthy to try and understand someone else's perspective, especially if it is one that opposes my own... But much of what this man talks about stems from fear, which then becomes arrogance to try and make himself seem superior. People sense this, too. It's not attractive; only to those who share the same qualities.
I can't imagine you and your loving sister having "intellectual discussions that warp, bend, and evolve into some pretty heavy stuff." The only way to do that is first have the Intellectual Capacity and it's obvious you do not. Second, you must read the book. You'll never do that, because one must have core moral values before anything of this nature can be important enough to read. You are afraid of how deep this book will see into your immoral soul.
There is an old adage that you and your loving sister should ponder..."It is better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open ones mouth and relieve all doubt!"
Beer Weird13, you said, "The only way to do that is first have the Intellectual Capacity and it’s obvious you do not."
What's the obvious indicator you're referring to?
You continued with, "Second, you must read the book."
Why on earth ... ? The guy is a joke, I wouldn't waste my time.
"You’ll never do that, because one must have core moral values before anything of this nature can be important enough to read."
Don't act like you know me or anything about my core moral values. You're a pathetic soul if you base your moral, ethical, and intellectual values on this sorry excuse for a publication.
And finally, perhaps you should consider your own advise? Clearly you're very lost in life...
I think the only closed minded person here is you. Your vulgar language, and closed-minded criticism makes me laugh. You call O'Riley closed minded, then go off on this rant and rave pulling quotes out from his book. An open-minded person would be able to intellectually compare and contrast these quotes and apply them in different situations. You allow your emotions to cloud your judgement. From this post, I can ascertain that you formulate your opinions solely based on the hardened shell you placed on your warped sense of reality. Any oppositions to what you believe to be true cause an emotional response. The reason for this is because you process your reality through your middle (or mammalian) brain. Your neocortex is probably reserved for reality TV and video games like the majority of our planet's society. You say that you have these mind warping "intellectual" discussions but your perception of depth can not even break the skin of the surface tension of the ocean.
Speaking of emotional responses toward "Any oppositions to what you believe to be true," isn't this the same response that encouraged you to type your comment about the content of this post? The author offended your beliefs enough to encourage you to produce a paragraph, which indirectly defends O'Reilly by directly criticizing the author.
"An open-minded person would be able to intellectually compare and contrast these quotes and apply them in different situations." So as opposed to comparing and contrasting these quotes in your own comment, which might prove why the author may be incorrect in his assessment, you yourself have gone off on a rant about how the author is, "closed minded," and uses "closed-minded criticism."
This is also closed-minded criticism: "Your neocortex is probably reserved for reality TV and video games like the majority of our planet's society." The probability that your accusations are correct are questionable, seeing as how they're based entirely on the opinions of one post, written by a person whose personality, values and history you know very little about.
You call yourself an "Advocate of reason," and yet you contradict yourself by doing the thing(s?) that you resent in others; an advocate of reason should at least be able to use reason. You're just a presumptuous, superficial, stereotyping, hypocritical idiot.
Leave a Comment
Trackback Responses to This Post: